Michael Moore´s Bowling For Columbine Essay - Words | Bartleby
The purpose of Bowling for Columbine and Koyaanisqatsi is not radically different, both directors are attempting to make an argument. In Bowling for columbine, Michael Moore is constructing an argument about the culture in some regions of the United States that are vulnerable to gun violence. To accomplish this he weaves together first person accounts from people responding to his questions on the issue and presents images that he wants the audience to connect with what they are seeing to create. Bowling for Columbine, a film by Michael Moore tries to bring some very important points to the foreground of American culture and to some degree succeeds, however, by manipulating different things in this movie it makes it hard for me to totally agree with what he has to say. One point Mr.
With this definition in mind, one could say Moore has been extremely successful in persuading the audience to agree with his message if his fiction movie won an Academy award for best documentary. Michael Moore wanted to seek to investigate and confront leading, powerful politicians for allowing this violent culture to worsen for their own benefit through creating this documentary. It is clear that Moore loves.
Moore also tried interviewing people whose lives had been affected due to guns. His aim for making the entire film was to put forward a good argument as to why people need such lethal weapons and show us what has happened due to the lack of concern for guns and ammunition. Moore picked out very efficient stories that included tragedies and the loss of loved ones, to have such an immense effect on people.